Monday, October 26, 2009

“RODNEY JERKINS' PLATE IS FULL: New Janet Jackson song, unreleased ... - EURweb” plus 4 more

“RODNEY JERKINS' PLATE IS FULL: New Janet Jackson song, unreleased ... - EURweb” plus 4 more


RODNEY JERKINS' PLATE IS FULL: New Janet Jackson song, unreleased ... - EURweb

Posted: 25 Oct 2009 11:53 PM PDT

"There is a certain groove, there is a certain melodic-ness to Janet and you have to be able to capture that. Also, Janet writes. A lot of the hits that happened in the past, Janet was heavily involved in the writing process. And if you look on her last three records, she didn't write at all. So that's the first thing I did with her. I gave her a pen and a pad and said, 'We're going back to the roots. I want you involved; I want to see how you feel."

*Grammy Award-winning songwriter and producer Rodney Jerkins has created hits and hot tracks for the likes of Whitney Houston, Britney Spears, Toni Braxton, Beyonce, and the King of Pop Michael Jackson. With a roster of megastar alliances such as this, Jerkins might have every right to arrogant, but he lives his life quite to the contrary.

The super producer might have simultaneous hits, but he takes it one day at a time, as one of the most sought after music producers around. He's finished up a track with Mary J. Blige and Drake that is not only a hit, but the AT&T commercial soundtrack and he's currently putting the finishing touches on a track with the sister of one of his greatest music collabo partners, Janet Jackson.

"Janet is coming out with a greatest hits album. It's due this winter for Christmas," Jenkins revealed. He produced the single "Make Me" for the new album.

"It's fun. We did it focusing on her fans," he said of the track. "We weren't trying to make a record that's going to compete with Rihanna or Beyonce; it really is a gift for her fans. We just really wanted to tap into her fanbase, and for me – being a fan – that made it easy for me."

Jerkins commented that while Jackson had a great chemistry with producers Jimmy Jam & Terry Lewis, new music from the pop star will more than likely not be Jam & Lewis dominated.

"They were taking her in a different direction, but it wasn't iconic," Jerkins said of the famous duo. "There is a certain groove, there is a certain melodic-ness to Janet and you have to be able to capture that. Also, Janet writes. A lot of the hits that happened in the past, Janet was heavily involved in the writing process. And if you look on her last three records, she didn't write at all. So that's the first thing I did with her. I gave her a pen and a pad and said, 'We're going back to the roots. I want you involved; I want to see how you feel."

Like we said, the new Jerkins/Jackson track is title "Make Me." The two-disc greatest hits album, titled "Number Ones," will include 33 classic hits ranging from "Control" to "Discipline" and is scheduled to be released mid-November.

As he mentioned, Jerkins has been a fan of Janet Jackson for some time; since her days as Penny on the 1970s television show "Good Times," but the musician told EUR's Lee Bailey, he considered himself both a huge fan and a close friend of Michael Jackson, who died this past summer.

"It was definitely a sad experience," he said in learning of and dealing with Jackson's passing. "We miss Michael as the superstar icon that we know him to be. I miss Michael as a friend. I cherish all the moments that I had a chance to spend with him. I can remember every single moment that I had with him and getting to know him as a person outside the music. Music was a big part of him as a person, but I learned a lot from working with Michael."

Jerkins said that he has to keep reminding himself not to dwell on the fact that the superstar has passed, but that his music must be celebrated all over the world.

"We have to celebrate the music that he left us. He left us with the best music ever. It's not every day that someone comes along and is able to make music that can impact the world and impact generations," he said.

Plus, as Jerkins revealed, there is a lot more Michael Jackson music that the world hasn't heard that the producer thinks will catapult Jackson's legacy even further.

"There are so many records that Michael broke, but there were so many more goals that he had. I would always say, 'Wow, how is it that this man stays so hungry with all that he's accomplished?' I knew some of those goals and now I think he's going to shatter some of their goals. It's sad that he won't be here to celebrate it."

Of the projects archived that he worked on with Jackson, Jerkins simply promised that they will be released in time.

"I don't think there's any reason to rush. Michael's legacy is forever. In due time, some of that music will be heard. It's exciting to know that there is new music to look forward to."

In the meantime, new music and a new act that Jerkins is working with are making a big splash on the music scene. Newcomer Verse Simmonds, who is signed to Jerkins Interscope/Darkchild record label, is all the buzz with his debut hit "Buy You A Round."

"I'm really excited about him. When you work with everybody you're always thinking, 'Who am I going to work with next?" I've always had success with female artists. I only had one #1 record with a male artist and that was Michael Jackson. And then this guy comes across my desk and I'm just excited about him," Jerkins said.

More on award-winning producer Rodney Jerkins and his new projects in Part II. Also, check his website (www.darkchild.com/). And for more info on Verse Simmonds, and to hear his music, check www.versesimmonds.com.

Watch Rodney Jerkins' protégé, Verse Simmonds:

 


---------------------
Drowning In Debt? Need CA$H NOW??
Visit:
www.MissionaryCMoney.com
Stop watching others reach their
Dreams and Act On Yours!!!
Call TODAY: 888-304-9888.
Based On Biblical Principles!
*Be Your Own Boss *Live Your Dreams
*Get Cash Daily *Be Financially Free
*Supplement Your Income *No Sales or Selling
*No Products To Peddle *Part Time/Full Time
*Immediate Cash *Not In Weeks, Or Months,
But In DAYS!!! Do You Have An Entrepreneurial
Spirit?? You Can Improve Your Situation NOW!!!


 RADIOSCOPE IS BACK & ONLINE!
The award winning, legendary RadioScope
is BACK and is now powered by EURweb.
HEAR today's top news and more TODAY
via our daily podcast. Check it out here:
www.eurweb.com/media.cfm

 

This content has passed through fivefilters.org.



image

This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

Hollywood all Abuzz about Luminous Hot Lashes Best heated eyelash ... - PR Leap

Posted: 26 Oct 2009 12:00 AM PDT

(PRLEAP.COM) First Ever! Beautiful Eyes, Inc the creators of Hot Lashes have once again, improved the effectiveness and the beauty of their curling system with the new and Improved Hot Lashes. With several hundred thousand Hot Lashes successfully sold — it was time for a Reincarnation, so the new Luminous Hot Lashes was born! These units boasts a new and improved heater element, a sheer lid to protect the gold eyelash curler and warming unit. And the new black Patented silicone pads are now infused with Tourmaline Crystals that when heated release negative Ions that set the curl from dawn till dusk. First ever in the Beauty Marketplace for Eyelash curlers!

Negative Ions work to condition eyelashes thereby smoothing and closing the cuticle layer. This makes your lashes soft and silky to the touch, shiny and healthy looking. Negative Ions also work to seal in the natural moisture of lashes.

"The Best new Heated eyelash curler ever! With the added convenience of the Hot Lashes Adaptor for plug in and the Tourmaline crystal Ionic technology is amazing! Love, Love this,Lashes so soft and beautifully curled" raves Dominique Graham head celebrity makeup artist for many Primetime Hit TV shows. She is referring to the new Hot Lashes heated eyelash curler with Tourmaline infused crystal gemstones.

The new Luminous Hot Lashes heated eyelash curler was selected and voted one of the top Eyelash Curling products in the marketplace, bar none by Top Makeup artists in Hollywood and has also reached the beautiful Stars who bat their eyelashes on the Award Winning red carpet. Makeup Artists have found that the combination of Luminous Lashes system works like a dream with the new craze of Lash extensions.

Beautiful Eyes, Inc phones rang off the hook the day after a CNN segment aired. Yonna Wynn, head of customer service states, "Customers called continuously wanting to know more about our products. And Film agents for the Top CAA talent agency in Beverly Hills called placing orders for their celebrity clients.

Top Beauty magazines have stated emphatically that long lasting curled eyelashes are an Absolute Must have And that having long beautifully curled eyelashes is the important step in making your eyes look bigger, brighter, more awake and beautiful.

InStyle magazine in their issue of Best Beauty Buys states, "To reduce wear and tear when curling, Monahan prefers heated lash curlers like Hot Lashes ($36.00: Hotlashes.com) Gentle heat softens hairs for more curl with less tension and pulling," she explains."

Our products are used on the entire female cast of many Primetime TV shows, so when the femme fatales bat their lashes, it packs a punch. Additionally Hot Lashes is being used by the Top Makeup artists on the sets of major television and film studios.

And Make up artists aren't the only ones who have added our products to their beauty regime. Jessica Alba, Beyonce, Britney Spears, Emma Roberts, Kristen Dunst, Liv Tyler, Jennifer Garner and Sarah Ferguson, the Duchess to name a few are some of the celebrities enjoying beautifully curled long eyelashes.

About This News Release

If you have any questions regarding information in these press releases please contact the organization listed in the press release. Issuers of press releases and not PR Leap are solely responsible for the accuracy of the content.

This content has passed through fivefilters.org.



image

This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

Season of false starts for news organizations - Morning Journal

Posted: 25 Oct 2009 10:13 PM PDT

Click to enlarge

Six-year-old Falcon Heene is shown with his father, Richard, outside the family's home in Fort Collins, Colo., after Falcon was found hiding in a box in a space above the garage. ASSOCIATED PRESS FILE PHOTO

NEW YORK — A balloon racing across the Colorado sky without a 6-year-old boy inside. A major lobbyist not changing its position on climate change. A shootout with terrorists on the Potomac River that never happened.

It's been a rough season for non-news.

The recent spate of hoaxes and premature stories exposes a dangerous fault line for journalists in the world of second-by-second news.

Each situation was unique. But they all diminished the credibility of news organizations at a time when the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press has reported that 63 percent of Americans believe news stories are often inaccurate — the worst report card it has ever seen.

"Speed is always a threat to accuracy, and the faster we can go, the more jeopardy the truth is in," said Deborah Potter, a former CBS News reporter and executive director of the News Lab think tank.

The balloon boy story riveted cable television news viewers a week ago. A flying saucerlike balloon had escaped from its tethers and Richard Heene reported to authorities that he believed his son Falcon was aboard. CNN, Fox News Channel and MSNBC all turned to the story to the exclusion of virtually all others.

Even in retrospect, it's hard to argue against that judgment. It was an unusual story, with gripping visuals, of a young boy's life in danger. Later, investigators alleged it was a hoax perpetrated by a publicity-hungry father.

What the story missed at the time was a bigger dose of skepticism and caution — more emphasis on the uncertainty of the report and curiosity about how a boy could fly in the structure.

In live broadcasts, anchors need to take care in emphasizing what is not known, said Frank Sesno, a former CNN Washington bureau chief who is now a professor at George Mason University.

"We're not doing it enough," he said, "because it's too easy to seize on something that appears to be happening before our eyes and run with it."

Perhaps tinged by disgust at the hoax itself, the media has suffered a backlash among people who believe too much time was spent on the story, said Mark Jurkowitz, associate director of Pew's Project for Excellence in Journalism.

A few days later in Washington, an official-looking press release from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce announced that the organization had reversed its position on climate change legislation.

Not so. It was an elaborate scam put on by members of the liberal activist group Yes Men, who were looking to draw attention to a policy stance with which it disagreed.

Reuters moved a story based on the false press release, and both CNBC and Fox Business Network reported it — with the anchors correcting themselves mid-story upon learning it was false.

In all the cases, a desire to push the story out fast took priority over a phone call to double-check.

"This is an example of how, when you get too careless and don't really do your homework, there's a price to pay," said Eric Wohlschlegel, communications chief for the Chamber of Commerce, who broke into the Yes Men's fake news conference to announce it was a hoax.

Mike Bonanno, a member of the Yes Men, said the group achieved its goal of spotlighting the policy. A day after its antics, a paper manufacturer in upstate New York resigned its membership in the chamber over the policy.

The frightening message: Hoaxes work.

Social media seems to be increasing the opportunity for mischief. False reports that Britney Spears, George Clooney, Jeff Goldblum and Natalie Portman had died spread on Twitter and Facebook in recent months, compelling major news organizations to check them out. The latest unfounded death rumor, only this month, concerned Kanye West. There's even a Web site devoted to creating fake news stories about celebrities.

It wasn't a hoax, but CNN created a stir on the emotionally fraught Sept. 11 anniversary by reporting that the U.S. Coast Guard had fired shots on a suspicious vessel in the Potomac. Reuters picked up the story, and Fox News Channel quickly jumped on it. It turned out CNN had mistaken a training exercise for the real thing.

Fox anchors talked about the report for several minutes even with an important clue staring them in the face — a live picture of the Potomac with cars streaming across a bridge. If there really had been a terrorist episode, wouldn't authorities stop traffic?

In the pre-Internet and pre-cable news days, journalists would have time to suss out the accuracy of a report, Jurkowitz said. Even with a current atmosphere where "beats" are often measured by the second, there's plenty of evidence that consumers care more about getting the latest information and getting it right.

Good luck. "This is the immovable object meets the unstoppable force," Sesno said.

Nowhere was the new landscape more vividly illustrated than this month when Nick Denton, chief of the irreverent Web site Gawker.com, issued a memo scolding his staff for a few cases "where we've thought WAY too much before publishing" a story.

Get something out fast with what we know, Denton wrote. We can always update.

"At some media organizations, you might get rapped for running a premature story," he wrote. "At Gawker Media, you'll lose way more points for being scooped on a story you had in your hands."

This content has passed through fivefilters.org.



image

Celebrity in the Noughties - News.com.au

Posted: 25 Oct 2009 11:10 PM PDT

THE Noughties will be remembered as a time of excess.

It was when things got a little out of hand, when everything went macro - scrutinised in minute detail and dragged across the pages of magazines, TV screens and computer monitors. We downloaded and barely had time to process the information before our minds were hungry for the next juicy morsel.

Our "lean cuisine" intake of celebrity and world events dumbed down our language; morphed it and gave us short attention spans. The latest news report became a mad lib - insert new celebrity name here, add bizarre outburst there. Suddenly everybody could be famous.

Your SayThe Noughties are coming to an end, with 2010 fast approaching. Can you think of a cool name for the new decade? Enter our competition and WIN!


So how did the real celebrities fight back? The movie stars, the television heroes, the musicians? What did they do in the Noughties which had never been done before? The brief was tough, but here are some events and behaviours which made living in the Noughties a memorable decade.

It was OK to lose the plot. In fact, everybody did it
It's hard to name a celebrity who didn't fire off at a paparazzo or throw an inanimate object during a particularly bad hotel stay in the past 10 years. Some did it Houdini-style (Britney Spears); others never made it back (Phil Spector). Most just got a public caning for a while (Mel Gibson, Amy Winehouse, Russell Crowe).

One thing was for sure, the baying public was there every step of the way thanks to a hungry media scrum.

We had drug addictions, curse afflictions, tantrums, career doldrums and on-set outbursts. Nobody was safe from the probing lenses. See our celebrity meltdowns video.

We saw more than we needed to, thanks very much
Those who thought Pamela Anderson's sex tape in 1998 was a one-off were sorely mistaken in the Noughties. 1 Night in Paris, in 2004, helped launch socialite and heiress Paris Hilton into the celebrity spotlight (despite her protestations) and from there it was, as they say, on for young and old. Socialite Kim Kardashian followed suit (with the unauthorised release of a sex tape) and soon she had locked in a reality TV deal. Other big names in sex tape scandals included Eric Dane, Verne Troyer and Colin Farrell. Sure there have been celebrity sex tapes throughout history, but the internet meant the distribution channels made them readily available. If the tape wasn't available, there were plenty of leaked nude and racy photos to pore over online, from High School Musical star Vanessa Hudgens to Disney princess Miley Cyrus. See our celebrity sex tapes and leaked nude pictures gallery.

Two became one, then morphed all over the place
Celebrity match-ups and bust-ups have been around forever. But what was special in the Noughties was that stars not only came together, their names were fused too. So Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez in 2003 became Bennifer (first known use of a celebrity Portmanteau word - formed by merging the sounds and meanings of two different , used in Lewis Carroll's day), Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie became Brangelina and so on. See our celebrity couple names gallery.

But the fun didn't stop there. Jolie made it fashionable for celebrities to adopt children from all around the world when, in 2002, she welcomed her first child, seven-month-old Maddox Chivan into her home. Madonna followed suit, adopting her first Malawian child, David Banda, in 2006. Most recently Katherine Heigl adopted 10 month old special needs Korean daughter Nancy Leigh, nicknamed, Naleigh and Sarah Jessica Parker and Matthew Broderick used a surrogate for the birth of their twins, Marion Loretta Elwell and Tabitha Hodge.

But wait, there's more. Not only did celebrities find new ways to have babies, they managed to come up with some rather inventive names for them. Enter Shiloh Jolie-Pitt, Suri Cruise and most recently, Sparrow Madden. See our celebrity broods and strange names gallery. One thing we hadn't seen before the Noughties were celebrity same-sex unions. TV talk show host Ellen DeGeneres announced in May last year she and her partner Portia de Rossi were engaged. They were married on August 16, 2008.

They had a lot of time on their hands, didn't they?
The Hollywood Writer's Strike, which started in 2007 and carried into 2008, left many in the entertainment industry worried about their futures. But not Arnold Schwarzenegger; he'd already dipped out and become the Governor of California.

Many began to see TV as a legitimate path, despite having lucrative film careers. Most notably and recently was Toni Collette's shift to the small screen in United States of Tara where she picked up an Emmy for Best Actress. Similarly, Hugh Jackman decided to tread the boards with blond Bond Daniel Craig in Broadway's A Steady Rain. Hollywood heavyweight Glenn Close took up a role in Damages, while Harvey Keitel switched to the US version of Life On Mars.

The rise of Twitter gave stars such as Ashton Kutcher and Demi Moore an outlet for their creative talents, while allowing fans to see into their lives even more closely. Musician John Mayer caught the Twitter bug too and it was the first decade where fans felt truly connected with the stars - although in his case perhaps it's a little too well connected. Other celebrities looked to charities and causes, with PETA securing the services of many stars for its nude campaigns. Scientology and Kabbalah were also thrust into the spotlight thanks to the star power of Tom Cruise and Madonna.

So how does the decade rate against those which came before? They called Hugh Jackman the Noughties version of Clint Eastwood, Scarlett Johansson the decade's Jayne Mansfield; everyone watched as history repeated itself, with the new generation looking for its own superstars and trends.

Little did they know that the next big Hey Hey It's Saturday would be … well, Hey Hey It's Saturday.

Coming up on Thursday, October 29: Sport in the Noughties.

Tell us your thoughts on Celebrity in the Noughties below.

This content has passed through fivefilters.org.



image

Sweeten-Shults: What is played at Gitmo isn't the issue - Wichita Falls Times Record News

Posted: 25 Oct 2009 09:58 PM PDT

As much as I love Beyoncé's "Single Ladies" — we in the Shults household have attempted to reproduce the "Single Ladies" video in front of our television without success — if I was barraged with the song, looped over and over again for 20 days, I would eat my own socks.

Music torture is the latest thing to come under fire in the wrangling over Guantánamo Bay, which President Barack Obama has said he would close in his first year in office.

According to an article Thursday in The Washington Post, musicians demanded the government release the names of songs used to torture prisoners at Guantánamo Bay since 2002, endorsing a Freedom of Information Act request filed by the National Security Archive, a Washington-based independent research institute seeking the declassification of all records related to the use of music interrogation practices.

Rap, country and heavy metal songs were the main choices in the Guantanamo tortures,.

According to Jayne Huckerbey, research director at the Center for Human Rights and Global Justice at the NYU School of Law quoted in The Washington Post article, prolonged use of music as a form of torture is a violation of the United Nations Convention Against Torture and constitutes "cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment."

Mentioned as some of the music played at Gitmo: "Stayin' Alive" by the Bee Gees, Bruce Springsteen's "Born in the USA," music from Barney and Sesame Street, anything by Britney Spears, Queen's "We Are the Champions" and "Hells Bells" and "Shoot to Thrill" by AC/DC. (I would have thrown DJ Unk's "Walk It Out" into the mix for good measure.)

Prisoner Binyam Mohamed said he was forced to listen to Eminem's "Real Slim Shady" for 20 days.

Musicians such as Roseanne Cash and Nine Inch Nails' Trent Reznor have spoken out publicly against the use of their music — created by their artistic hand and meant for listeners to enjoy — as torture devices. They say they're appalled that their songs would be used in such a way.

If I were a musician, I'd be upset, too. I mean, what a blow to the ego to learn that one of your songs is actually torturous to someone.

Then again, these musicians are seeking for the release of a list of songs. They actually want to know if their music made it on the list.

I imagine those egos are really enormous to think the torturers would be so concerned about which songs they played that they kept an official list. I imagine the artists want to know so they can whine about it, make the government pay them damages to quell those big egos and then make the government create a National-No-Play-If-Torture-Is-Involved List — you know, kind of like the National No-Call List.

It's all just petty. Except for the musicians, who cares exactly which songs were played?

Music has been used as a torture technique for a while, and not just by the U.S. government, to break down prisoners mentally — make them go crazy — so that in their fragile mental state they just give up and do anything to make the incessant sound noise stop. It's not even a matter of what songs are chosen. Any song, after being played over and over again for weeks will break anyone down.

Rather than waste time lobbying to find out what music was played, the musicians should keep their focus on the real objective, which is to close Guantánamo Bay, an embarrassment to the U.S. in the realm of human rights. That's where the real music lies.

"The Buzz" is a pop culture/entertainment column. "The Buzz" writer Lana Sweeten-Shults can be reached at shultsl@timesrecordnews.com or follow her on Twitter at trn_next.

This content has passed through fivefilters.org.



image

This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

No comments:

Post a Comment